A Fact Heavy Post

Fact 1/1:

When you are alive and imperfect there is no course of corrective action you can take to avoid criticisms of your personal appearance.

People don’t enter the public sphere because their nose is perfect and their hat is timeless. Instead, they go outside because they need medicine, sunshine, and strap perfects.
Face and head area criticisms are especially confusing to me because they aren’t explicitly solicited. I mean, if face/head ownership were a trial, the opening argument isn’t “I’m beautiful” so the rebuttal of “No, you’re not” is unwarranted. The true opening argument to the head/face ownership case is:

Sometimes folks criticize a person’s “inner beauty.” Inner beauty is a term people use to make non-models feel good about themselves or to make models feel bad about themselves. Inner beauty is an even more inferior judgment criterion because it’s evaluated without an extensive knowledge of a person’s swagger. It's a worse judgment point than outer beauty because someone’s face is someone’s face is someone’s face. If you’re going to judge it, you simply have to look at what's in front of you. Unless you’re attempting to do so during a SARs outbreak.

But a person’s inner beauty is difficult to assess thoroughly. All inner beauty judgments made without at least 4 months of observational research are irrelevant.

In sum, always wait until SARs outbreaks subside before judging a person’s face, if the SARs outbreak is still occurring in your hometown, move- your local medical staff is incompetent, and don’t judge anyone’s inner beauty unless they steal your strap perfects four months straight.